Related posts

11 thoughts on “OPUS 154 Trump’s Negotiation Style

  1. Chia Cha

    Biggest sociopaths today are people in polished suits looking without any mistake, as the most dangerous people on earth. Those are those paying both to have and not have any dental solution available. Such have all teeth protected, and no dental problems, as all their teeth are polished by demons. From the soci@list point of view all such with perfect suits, are there to help future archaeologists later to determine the more easily societal class structure of our age by looking at a job done on teeth.

    1. Chia Cha

      Big data always win. The company not being processed by a processor combining company data with big data will be uneconomical. US private economy (private companies) are destined to become uneconomical because all data are private in the US. https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/05/27/china-pushes-back-against-international-isolation-by-promoting-big-data-cooperation/

  2. Chia Cha

    Feudalism had armed rebellions conducted by serfs every day. Especially in the late stage. But serfs were not demanding to abolish rich people and (end feudalism). Slaves were also rebelling against slave owners. But no slave was ever demanding to end slavery (end rich = slave owners), they just wanted freedom, but never to end slavery. Therefore slaves or serfs did not have any leverage over slaveowners (rich) or any chance for their whole society to evolve. We are living those last days of possible resistance in the history of mankind. Communists (state capitalists) are capitalists who never allowed soci@lism. You do not get soci@lism by simply abolishing capitalism.

    1. Chia Cha

      Unequal distribution of resources makes incentives to work enough to keep the economy going no matter if that inequality related to any kind of work or achievement. That has to be like that for inequality to happen more easily because if it is on all levels incentives are on all levels. That works in theory, but not in reality. Therefore any base or reason for inequality is good enough for them. Even it is a fact that it is very burdensome to subsidise owners of excess capital (more than what they needed or what they earned via work). For instance, in capitalism workers must work to sustain rental property of rental property owner (give real work) to pay that property owner for his renal property to be maintained by society and his bodybag to be fed even he does not work. And even such a person is destroying the incentive of workers to work. Plus workers must pay police for his property to be protected, even that is not the interest of workers. Of course, property tax is there to make those small rental property owners decimated (those are not big parasites enough) to be more easily bought by those who have more of those. Problem is that the number of parasites is growing and they are getting more and more resources to be fed.

      1. Chia Cha

        Therefore the theory is that workers will work so maybe one day in their life they would be able to live as those who are paid to not work even chances for that are around 0%. The problem is we must pay those lies we are fed to owners of capital so their private media can sell us that lie. Those are huge costs. Even the truth is that more chance you have by playing sport prognosis, by putting the house on a tennis match for instance.

        1. Chia Cha

          For instance, betting on sport is able to function only because there is a sea of greedy and stingy workers giving 1$ for ticket betting of 10-20 events aiming in their evil greed to get 5 000$. Owners are recognizing that they would not be profitable if people would play just big bets on one event (a lie is smaller, and the social focus of workers is bigger) and things are more measurable. They admit they are earning only on many those small greedy idiots.

          1. Chia Cha

            And they are not saying they would ban you from putting 500,000$ on one tennis match. For propaganda reason of course. Because that lie that they would accept also that match on that amount is crown propaganda. Yes, they would not refuse you unless you are rich already (rich celebrity or something having more money than them). Therefore all private companies are social very responsible to keep a number of slaves live and well while giving bigger capital owner licence. Without any needed for additional regulations. Otherwise, a capitalist state would have to ban them by law.

  3. Chia Cha

    Polish Marxist economist was 100% right. I can only add that the private sector is unable to spread wealth because private people are only able to invest to collect wealth. Only government via force (taxation) is able to spread wealth collected violently from taxation. Violence on collectors violence is the only way to make wealth happen. Only the government creates wealth workers can enjoy (get part of surplus). In capitalism, it is impossible for slaves (workers) to get any surplus value if violence by government is involved only to protect property rights. For instance, on Haiti or in Bangladesh, perfect capitalist countries, all property rights of property owners are enforced and protected. https://mises.org/wire/neo-marxist-roots-modern-monetary-theory

  4. Jason

    Holler back Chia. I sent email address to you a few minutes ago, I think.

    1. Chia Cha

      Great, I found it. Let me reply.

  5. Charles

    Wisdom Better Than Folly

    13 I also saw under the sun this example of wisdom(Y) that greatly impressed me: 14 There was once a small city with only a few people in it. And a powerful king came against it, surrounded it and built huge siege works against it. 15 Now there lived in that city a man poor but wise, and he saved the city by his wisdom. But nobody remembered that poor man.(Z) 16 So I said, “Wisdom is better than strength.” But the poor man’s wisdom is despised, and his words are no longer heeded.(AA)

    17 The quiet words of the wise are more to be heeded
    than the shouts of a ruler of fools.
    18 Wisdom(AB) is better than weapons of war,
    but one sinner destroys much good.

Comments are closed.